Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:)

[Leonid Pauzner]

> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Henry Nelson wrote:

>> > > is the case. Futher documenting of 'g lynxcompileopts:' seems excessive.]
>> >                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > Except if there is an expectations that anyone should actually
>> > do what the Configuration Definitions page says:
>> >
>> >  "When reporting a bug, please include a copy of this page."

We could improve lynx-dev.html and/or other parts of the documentation
where "reporting a problem" procedure is described.

> I don't find it very efficient to repeat a simple question like
> "Which version of lynx are you using?" again and again and again.
> Or "Is you lynx compile with slang or curses" (which many users don't
> know how to find out).

>    Klaus