> which comes in 2 flavors, `Key-based' & `Forms-based'. ^^^^^^^^^ Thanks for reminding me. "Key" seems intuitive ("more than fixed fields"). No need to respond to my request in the previous post. > i argued that `Options Menu' is a tautology. I think for historical reasons, if nothing else, it would be better to stick with `Options Menu' and just add modifiers to that when necessary. __Henry
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS... Klaus Weide
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILE... Leonid Pauzner
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) Henry Nelson
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) Henry Nelson
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) Henry Nelson
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS... Klaus Weide
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILE... Leonid Pauzner
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) Henry Nelson
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) Henry Nelson
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) Henry Nelson