From: Klaus Weide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can someone remind me why putting everything on one command line > (which doesn't work for all platforms anyway) is supposed to be better > than editing the file userdefs.h? I don't know the original reason. However, I find it much easier to write a shell command which invokes configure with all the flags than continually having to re-edit userdefs.h to set the values I want . -- Larry W. Virden <URL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> <*> O- Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should be construed as representing my employer's opinions. -><-
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- lynx-dev userdefs.h vs config (was different) Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev userdefs.h vs config (was different) Doug Kaufman