Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing protection is weak

[T.E.Dickey]

> Actually, I forgot about the third nasty he finds, buffer overruns: 

there's fewer of them now, but probably impossible to remove all (if we
can reproduce this one, we'll remove it).
  
> > > 1a) Well but how many of those title comparisons are really in some way  
> > > "security" relevant?  I.e. what exactly depends on the right outcome?  
> >  
> > he's saying that all of them are (of course). 
>  
> So does your "(of course)" mean that you agree with him?  Or the opposite? 
> :) 

neither - "of course" he finds a wide scope on the problem he is complaining
about.
  
  
>    Klaus 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey