On Sat, 8 Jan 100, T.E.Dickey wrote: >[...] > > As for HTMLSRC_*:blah-blah it was choosen the best name PRETTYSRC_SPEC:: > > since it deals with -prettysrc and assume something "special":)) > > could we interpret `spec' this way also? > > (will see what response this gets) I don't understand what you, Tom and Leonid, are talking about. What do you mean by "interpretting 'spec' this way"? Best regards, -Vlad
- lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, ... rjp
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, ... Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTY... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PR... Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg T.E.Dickey
