>
> On Sat, 8 Jan 100, T.E.Dickey wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > > As for HTMLSRC_*:blah-blah it was choosen the best name PRETTYSRC_SPEC::
> > > since it deals with -prettysrc and assume something "special":))
> > > could we interpret `spec' this way also?
> >
> > (will see what response this gets)
>
> I don't understand what you, Tom and Leonid, are talking about. What do you
> mean by "interpretting 'spec' this way"?
I wasn't sure (and it did not sound like a definite proposal, so I am looking
at the responses).
> Best regards,
> -Vlad
>
--
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
