There is one advantage to retaining the old sendmail.exe mailer, rather than using blat.exe: Sendmail.exe has a "MAPI" option, which means that it can be used to invoke the Windows mail program to edit and send email, which includes all the capabilities of that mailer, such as binary attachments. This is a realistic alternative to having lynx call an editor. It also conjures up the use of the Windows mail program to spool email, Unix-style and elegant. That leaves blat.exe as the backup mail program, if there is a problem with using the mailer that comes with Windows 95/98/NT. P. S. Why have a -noblat option on lynx.exe if the USE_BLAT compiler option forces blat.exe as the default mailer?
- lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Gerardo Lopez
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Michael Lerman
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Duncan Simpson
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx mattack
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Martin McCormick
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Duncan Simpson
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Spooling and MAPI with lynx... vtailor
- Re: lynx-dev Spooling and MAPI with... Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev SSL and Lynx Henry Nelson
