On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 08:14:00PM +0100, David Woolley wrote: > > I thought Lynx was purely open-sourced FreeWare. In this case, > > is it commercial, patented code which allows special exceptions > > for NON-commercial use? The Lesser GPL? > > Lynx is full GPL. SSL Lynx is non-commercial use only in the USA, snip "Lesser" gpl? Is that the "LGPL"? Please, what IS the LGPL? Is COMMERCIAL software allowed to include something that's under an LGPL license? Also -- what are the OTHER licenses for freeware -- that do NOT restrict commercial software from using? Thanks David ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream? Duncan Simpson
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become ma... pAb-032871
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) becom... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) b... Duncan Simpson
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) b... David Combs
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... Chuck Martin
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... pAb-032871
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainst... David Woolley
