> > More directly, why would someone want to mail from Lynx with Pine (or > > Mutt or Elm)? Why not just mail with Pine straight off? > > > "Mailto:"; URLs?
In other words, Lynx's native support of "mailto:"; URLs is too clumsy? Or lynxcgi's, lynxprog's and/or pseudo-proxies are too hard to set up? __Henry ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
