On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 12:01:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> It seems that literate programming guys are good at coding and
> documenting their code... If it was not the case, people would ask
> what's the point of literate programming ;)
Good point. I guess more of us should start doing that. How long until the
LyX code is a noweb document?
> I think this script should become part of the reLyX distribution, even
> better, it might be possible to merge it with reLyX, now that the code
> exists. Until then, it could be packaged and installed along with
> reLyX.
Yeah, it would be nice if we merged it into reLyX.
It shouldn't be too hard to break nwconvert in two pieces, and have 'reLyX
-n' (for example) automatically call the pre- & post-processing subroutines.
> It would probably be a good idea to find a name with 'lyx' in it,
> though. 'nwconvert' looks like a very generic name to me...
Kayvan suggested nw2lyx. Why not the less cryptic noweb2lyx? (I know; it's
three more keystrokes. I apologize :) Or even reLyX_noweb (or noweb_reLyX),
so that it's obviously connected to reLyX. Although I guess the average user
couldn't care less what it is, as long as it works.
-Amir
