>>>>> "Asger" == Asger Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I still have one concern with the LyX server code but I don't want
>> to abuse of your patience any longer. I will speak of this another
>> time.
Asger> I have patience to hear what the problem is now. I see no
Asger> reason to hold anything relevant back.
Speaking about lyxserver problems, there is one which bothers me now:
it does not work at all on Digital Unix, due to a peculiarity of the
select() implementation (excerpt from the man page):
[Digital] Objects ready for the requested operation are those which the
operation would not block and not necessarily those which have data avail-
able for the operation.
So the current behaviour is that the pipes are constantly being
created/deleted by LyX, which is not very convenient (select() is
triggered, and since there is nothing to read in the pipe, lyx
considers that there is an error and closes the pipe).
Any idea?
JMarc
