>>>>> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I thought we had already agreed two monthes ago where the line was. Bo> The exact problem is that the line moves. When I had trouble with Bo> processes a few months ago, QProcess was out of the question. Bo> I do agree with Georg that we should not touch existing code if Bo> they are not broken (since it is tempting to replace the process Bo> stuff with QProcess), and GUII should be kept. However, new stuff Bo> like Xml may take advantage of now-in-support qt support. Bo> Do we all agree on the following? Bo> 1. GUII should be kept. (No QtGui beyond frontend/qt4) Yes. Bo> 2. Existing code should not be converted to Qt... unless a bug is Bo> found. Yes. Bo> 3. none GUI Qt functions can be used for new features. Well, only when it is very clear that there is no reasonable alternative (via boost for example). JMarc
