On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:19, Darren Freeman wrote: > I think we should think carefully about the dependence on this package > for 1.5.0. There will be people who are used to LyX working on their > system who try out the 1.4 or 1.5 series and can't work this out on > their own.
> Of course the 1.3 series seemed to work fine without it and it had > similar functionality, is it possibly better to handle this in LyX > instead? OK now I'm *even* *more* *confused*. The system I just compiled LyX on, which ran 1.3.x fine, doesn't have a file called "prettyref.sty" (that I could find). It does have "hyperref.sty" if that might be related. Yet it works fine with the latest svn. Could somebody please explain what is going on? Have fun, Darren
