On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Just a though... why do we need the invalidation signals at all? ...couldn't > we go in fixIfBroken from the top to the tip of the DocIterator checking > that there is an inset an the given position in the paragraph, and that the > pointer of that inset is the one in the iterator in the next slice (as well > as the idx, pit, pos checks)?
This would probably be saner thatn what we have now but still lead to funyy behaviour asm in [inset 1] \par [inset |2] \par [inset 3] Delete par 1 and you'll end up with [inset 2] \par [inset |3] Andre'
