Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > Here is the rewrite of updateLabel I have been coming up with. I think
| > the approach is sound, and anyway we have to cleanup the current mess
| > (full of xxx_CODE). Please have a look, I'd like to commit it "soon".
| > I am sure it has some small bugs, but I am confident they can be
| > worked around. OTOH, if someone points out a more fundamental problem,
| > I'll hold it.
|
| One minor comment: your patch will most certainly conflict with my MVC
| branch. If you have 10 minutes, could you please have a look at it and
| merge it before you apply your patch?
I really wanted to stay out of this, but I just can't...
Lars is your name :-)
This is _not_ the way to work with branches. You as the branch owner
must do the work of splitting up your (now quite huge I guess) patch,
show it to others, make it palatable for them and do the commit.
I've explained long and large many times what this is about. I am not
going to split my branch in patches, otherwise doing work in branch has
zero benefits. My svn logs are always very verbose so one should be able
to understand each and every commits if he'd like to, including you.
I would never ever expect anyone to blindly merge any branch. Not even
my own.
OK, I'll do it.
Abdel.
