How do I compile these? When I use Import > LaTeX (plain) I get a weird file, with both those files. I can attach a screen shot if you want me to.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Amir Rachum wrote: > >> Here is an example, hope that helps. >> >> thanks >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> rgheck wrote: >> >> Amir Rachum wrote: >> >> I've recently upgraded to LyX 1.6 and using Windows XP. >> I use the document class article (Hebrew). I use the proof >> environment, but >> in the new version, after I render to pdf, the proof doesn't >> start at a new >> line. >> i.e in LyX I see: >> >> bla bla bla >> proof: bla bla 2 >> >> and after I render I see: >> >> bla bla bla proof bla bla 2 >> >> >> This happens with documents I edited with the previous >> version of LyX and >> they render fine with 1.5. >> What can I do? >> >> >> >> Hi, Amir! >> >> Can you please send a minimal example which includes this problem? >> I'd like to see three files: the LyX file itself, an export to latex >> from 1.5 (i.e., an example with correct output), and an export to >> latex from 1.6 (with incorrect output). That'll help us figure out >> what's wrong. >> >> Dov >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Amir Rachum >> > > Hmm, it looks like there's a missing newline in the tex output which is > causing the problem: attached find the tex output I'm getting from Amir's > LyX file in 2.0svn (in which the problem he describes exists), and a fixed > tex output which displays correctly, I think (Amir, can you confirm that the > fixed output is correct?). > > Does anyone have any ideas why that newline disappeared? > > On a separate note, just out of curiosity: I'm not able to compile the 1.6 > tex output Amir sent --- I'm getting > > LaTeX Error: Command \textquotedbl unavailable in encoding LHE > > Juergen -- this looks like it may be related to what you just fixed? But I > don't understand why it seems to be compiling for Amir without any trouble? > Anyhow, I don't know if this is important; I don't think it's related to his > problem, in any case.... > > Dov > -- Amir Rachum
