> I think there is a need for uniformizing the method names depending on > their behaviour. There is no getArg, getArgContents and no getFullOpt, > for example
Well, I haven't introduced names like "getFullArg". When you want a different name for "getOptContent" please rename it when you like. But what is wrong with this name, it returns the content and not the whole optional argument like "getOpt"?
regards Uwe
