Le 15/06/2009 21:35, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> I think there is a need for uniformizing the method names depending on
> their behaviour. There is no getArg, getArgContents and no getFullOpt,
> for example
Well, I haven't introduced names like "getFullArg". When you want a
different name for "getOptContent" please rename it when you like. But
what is wrong with this name, it returns the content and not the whole
optional argument like "getOpt"?
I did not say that I did not like the name, but it is a good practice
when defining new methods to give them nqmes thqt blend correctly with
the rest, in order to tame entropy (if I may say).
JMarc
