Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net> writes: >> Why not, but it is a bit fragile IMO. That would be like the Linkback >> support, right? > > Why would that be fragile? > Do you mean if USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING is true and it is not Mac OS X >= > 10.4?
Packaging is just packaging. If we had a gnustep port, it would use this very packaging, but we would not have AppleSpell. I agree though that it is a theoretical concern. > Hmm... linkback uses the macro Q_WS_MACX. We should be uniform here. > Should I use Q_WS_MACX for the interface for Apples spell checker too? Q_WS_MACX only makes sense in places where we have Qt macros available, so it is not a generic solution either. Leave it as it is. JMarc
