Il 06/03/2011 23:12, Jim Oldfield ha scritto:
If I understand you right, sure, see attached. Not even a special inset, just
formatted references and the preamble code I gave.
. . . and the Document->Settings->[uncheck "User refstyle instead of
prettyref"]
Interestingly, at the end of the document you point out yourself that
the generated
latex is relatively "unstable", i.e., a small user action and it doesn't
compile anymore.
In fact, also checking back the checkbox above does not make it compile
(but if you
customize the preamble you expect you're going through this, don't you ?)
I agree that there are several possible problems here, including lack of
awareness of formatted references, and the fact you need to use LaTeX to
customise formats. However I think it makes more sense to live with them/
overcome them individually than come up with a radically different non-LaTeX
solution (just my opinion).
that's also why I proposed that patch as an optional additional entry,
which allows
to go for the old way, if preferred.
One question: can anyone point me to where exactly, in the code, there
is the
distinction between the use of prettyref as opposed to refstyle, for the
generated
xref macros ?
Thx,
T.
