On 7 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | also I personally would like to see a re-organisation of the lyxfunc code
> | to be more organised, as I briefly mentioned earlier. This would also be a
> | great oppportunity for me to learn some more advanced C++ ;)
>
> Yes, please. If not for anything else than to lower compile times.
>
> two øre:
> - in the current lyxfunc all cases should be one liners and
> call other methods instead of inlining a lot of lyxfuncs.
> - have several dispatch levels, we could easily have a
> LyX::dispatch, LyXView::dispatch, Buffer::Dispatch
>
> Lgb
Actually I was hoping to ditch the big switch altogether, i.e. have little
functions for each action. But of course I haven't looked at it in detail
thanks
john
--
FOCUS: So where does this common feeling of frustration come from that
unites all the PC users? Everybody experiences it every day that these
things simply don't work like they should.
Bill Gates: Because it's cool. It's like, "Yeah, been there done that - oh,
yeah, I know that bug." - I can understand that phenomenon sociologically,
not technically.
