Cyrille Artho wrote: > The "underbrace" solution is very nice in principle (and useful for > character styles that may not be easily recognizable), but of course it > does not lend itself to breaking up one box into three boxes.
These are secondary questions (not in terms of importance, but in terms of the implementation procedure). First, we need to have three-box drawing (the goal of this gsoc proposal). The "decoration" of the inset can and must be adapted later. Box drawing and decoration drawing are separated in the code, and the later is comparatively trivial. I'd propose to limit the gsoc project to the box drawing. Regards, Jürgen
