Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Just to add my own interpretation of what this would look like: I > think Cyrille is worried that breaking one box into three will look > unnecessarily complicated to the user. However I think it will be the > opposite. Right now to the user it looks complicated. I don't think > the user will realize that there is a three box interpretation. It > would look natural (as opposed to the current situation of putting > everything in a box perhaps on a different line, even though in the > output it will be in-line).
Well put. Note that the boxes itself are "invisible". This is just a metaphor for the space required by the text lines. Regards, Jürgen
