Guenter Milde wrote: > Agreed. OTOH, I would prefer to have tests separated from src/, so maybe > > lib/ > src/ > tests/ > unittests/ > export-tests/ > functional/ > tests-scripts > input/ > expected/ # expected output > output/ # just a dir for the output, no content in the repo
If nobody objects to a new toplevel directory then this is fine with me as well. > Maybe sub-dirs for the different export routes would be good. Many special > tests are for just one export format, others could by symlinked. This > could reduce noise and need for inversions. I'd like to use symlinks, but they create trouble on windows, since not many people (and more important: authors of utilities like file managers, file compressors etc) do know that NTFS supports symlinks, and by default non- Admin users may not create them. Georg
