On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:36:09PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-01-03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > If you are OK with these other test failures and you think it is the right > > thing to do, then correct the test labels such that there shouldn't be any > > differences to test failures after your patch is applied. Post a new patch > > and > > I will confirm that nothing changes. > > Actually, you list is good news: > > There are even more cases of test thats "fails to fail" than I expected. Good. > In all cases of new inversions, this is just extending an existing inversion > for "pdf[45]_systemF" to ".*_systemF" - this is a hint to a problem with > polyglossia > (either the language nesting bug or some known incompatibility with some > other package). OK good to know. > I hope the attached patch addresses all changing test cases. I do not see an attached patch. Did it not attach correctly? > All in all not only the logic is simpler but also the number of > inversions is lowered. Sounds like a full step forward. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
