Joel Kulesza wrote: > I have gcc 4.6.1, 4.7.0, 4.7.2, 4.8.2, 4.9.2, and 5.3.0 available. Are > any > of those known to be particularly successful with this vintage of Qt? If > not, I'm afraid I'll be without 2.2.0 on this system (I am not the admin > so simply installing a package isn't an option)...
If the error is really caused by qt I would use one from a similar era. qt 4.6 came out in 2009, so that means gcc 4.6. However, the error could also be caused by the combination of the new std::string implementation (introduced in gcc 5.1) and qt, if that is the case then gcc 4.9 should work as well. Georg
