On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:50:53AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > The patch solves two issues: > > > > 1. gets rid of the issue with the radio buttons that I posted about. > > > > 2. makes room for both the "Outline" and "Settings" tab names to show, > > so there is no clipping and the arrows are not needed (did other people > > see this issue as well or just me?). > ... > > The disadvantage of the patch is that the minimum size required is now > > larger than before. Perhaps some people not as bothered as I was by the > > I am sorry to react so late, but you this patch ruins long term effort to > make this pane as thin as possible when needed. I got that trimmed radio > buttons are not nice (I dont see them on my setup, but OK), but the effort > to make both tab names to appear fully make the pane big and we(/me?) > fought against that for a long time. There is even bug in trac about that > and long term flow of semi-successful patches to solve it. Recently > IIRC Uwe figured out way how to solve it in more elegant way. > > Now the major point of this panel is to look at its output and not its > preference setting and, to me, the impossibility to shrink the pane > size to something decent while debugging sucks much more than the cosmetic > issues described in its preferences. > I would quite prefer that if you don't touch the minimum room for outline > and output tabs. If you need to fix those radio button for fex pixels that > should be fine though.
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I understand why you are against the increase so I won't proceed. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
