Richard Heck wrote: > On 07/01/2016 04:13 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >> >> Richard, OK for branch as well? > > Yes, that's fine.
OK, it is in. > Did anyone add Dima to the credits? I did forget that originally, but now it is done. Someone just needs to update the credits on the web page (I do not have a working setup for that anymore). > Now we just need an installer built this way. My proposal would be to release 2.2.1 soon and do not build an additional 2.2.0 installer. This avoids confusion for users (why so many 2.2.0 installers?), contradicting news items (2.2.0 does not support vista, 2.2.0 supports vista), and additional testing work. Also, 2.2.1 has already accumulated lots of bug fixes, including a rather important lyx2lyx bug 10243 which could lead to data loss. The 2.2.1 announcement could then state that vista is supported again. Georg
