On 07/02/2016 04:28 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> Now we just need an installer built this way. > My proposal would be to release 2.2.1 soon and do not build an additional > 2.2.0 installer. This avoids confusion for users (why so many 2.2.0 > installers?), contradicting news items (2.2.0 does not support vista, 2.2.0 > supports vista), and additional testing work. Also, 2.2.1 has already > accumulated lots of bug fixes, including a rather important lyx2lyx bug > 10243 which could lead to data loss. The 2.2.1 announcement could then state > that vista is supported again.
I was planning to write about this early next week, anyway, so perhaps this is the best way to go. I'll send a "Planning for 2.2.1" email soon. Richard
