Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 15:10:09, schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> > Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 13:44:17, schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net> > > Dear Kornel, > > > > On 2016-11-07, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 07:29:39, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > <mi...@users.sf.net> > > > > >> the recent discussion about http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10474 > > >> showed, that input encoding support was never fully tested. > > > > >> I suggest to extend the tests in > > >> autotests/export/latex/Unicode-characters > > >> to all encodings defined in lib/encodings. > > > > >> Could you write a rule testing > > >> "autotests/export/latex/Unicode-characters/*.lyx" with all encodings > > > > > I don't understand. This directory already exists ... > > > > Yes, but currently, it only tests 2 out of 51 LyX-supported input encodings. > > And, it does so with 2*9 separate files for 9 Unicode blocks in 2 fixed > > encodings (ascii and utf8). > > > > Instead of adding 9*49 new files (and changing 51 files with every > > correction/addition), I'd prefer a ctest rule that allows to test all 51 > > LyX-supported input encodings based on 9 sample files. > > > > The test machinery does a similar action with the test of various export > > routes for one sample file. > > > > Just like doc/de/Intro.lyx is tested as > > > > Test #923: export/doc/de/Intro_xhtml > > Test #924: export/doc/de/Intro_dvi > > Test #925: export/doc/de/Intro_dvi3_texF > > Test #926: export/doc/de/Intro_dvi3_systemF > > Test #927: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf > > Test #928: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf2 > > Test #929: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf3 > > Test #930: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf4_texF > > Test #931: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf4_systemF > > Test #932: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf5_texF > > Test #933: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf5_systemF > > Yes, but this is derived from possible lyx export types. > > > I'd like an "expansion" of > > export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols.lyx into > > > > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2 > > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_utf8 > > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_armscii > > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_latin1 > > ... > > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_tis620-0 > > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_utf8-plain > > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_ascii > > > > Would this be feasible? > > Yes, it is. New parameter for useSystemFonts.pl. But I'd prefer to use it > only for > files in a special directory. > Do you want to test also combinations like 084-misc-symbols_pdf4_utf8 ?
Ouch .. I see you already want it ... > Looks like overkill ... > > > Thanks, > > > > Günter > > > Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
