Hi Scott, Why not taking current master and name it Alpha 2? I don't think it is important how many alphas we release.
If you don't agree, then let's better wait for the alpha2 you like to release. Having a Win version for alpha1 is indeed not very important. Regards Uwe Original Message From: Scott Kostyshak Sent: Mittwoch, 26. April 2017 03:46 To: Richard Heck Cc: Kornel Benko; lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org; Uwe Stöhr Subject: Re: 2.3.0alpha1 tar balls are available On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:13:11AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/25/2017 06:25 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 25. April 2017 um 12:19:20, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > > <uwesto...@web.de> > >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. April 2017 um 07:28 Uhr > >>> Von: "Scott Kostyshak" <skost...@lyx.org> > >>> > >>> OK. Since we won't be able to make a Windows build for alpha1, > >> Ehm, no. Could you please check why the 2 files are missing in the tarball > >> and release a new tarball including the 2 files? > >> > >> I copied the 2 missing files into the build directory of alpha 1 from > >> master and got a working build for alpha 1. So everything is ready. > >> > >>> Thus, there would be no Windows binaries for alpha1. > >> I invested some time to get files signed and to update the installer for > >> LyX 2.3 so I want to release of course. > >> > >> regards Uwe > > Already committed in master. > > Can we tag alpha1-1 and have Uwe release that? That's a good idea. Should I create a branch from alpha1-1 and cherry pick only Kornel's fixes? Scott
