On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:33:12PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > > I find that the enhancement request came in a bit late in the 2.3 > release process for such a sensitive issue, and that 2.3 already > improves the situation with the needauth mechanism. So, if we conclude > that an implementation of Pygments should not have to request > -shell-escape, then I do not agree that this question is important and > must be addressed before 2.3.0beta1 (besides, for me it is not > well-framed either).
I don't think that your opinion is sincere. I think that instead it is again hypocritical. It was amusing reading that "I do not oppose to needauth because it was an improvement, while shell escape is a security hazard". They entail the same security risk, so either you are really concerned about security or you are simply using specious arguments. And i think that this last one is the case. I was not specifically interested in minted support and was actually encouraged in adding it. It seems that removing this support is becoming the reason of your life for the simple pleasure of hurting. I did not expect anything better from you, frankly. -- Enrico
