Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 04:16:22, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:23:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:34:53PM +0200, jpc wrote: > > > commit c9f398d7c516f9e9f3df71e74231a87e639180b9 > > > Author: jpc <[email protected]> > > > Date: Wed Jul 12 22:31:30 2017 +0200 > > > > > > Copy documentation of new features of Additional.lyx in de, es, fr > > > and ja documentation files > > > as change tracking and remove chnage tracking in Additional.lyx > > > > > > lib/doc/Additional.lyx | 484 ++------------------ > > > lib/doc/de/Additional.lyx | 994 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > lib/doc/es/Additional.lyx | 995 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > lib/doc/fr/Additional.lyx | 1009 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > lib/doc/ja/Additional.lyx | 1137 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 5 files changed, 4080 insertions(+), 539 deletions(-) > > > > This commit broke the following tests: > > > > export/doc/de/Additional_pdf4_systemF > > export/doc/de/Additional_pdf5_systemF > > > > I just wanted to document which commit broke the test, in case anyone > > wanted to take a look (it's possible it's due to a bug in our language > > nesting/switching) and so that when others see the failing test they are > > aware. > > Actually the errors I see are about missing glyphs. I don't think there > is a regression here. > > Scott
Looks like we cannot use \texcompmark macro in xelatex and lualatex.
Kornel
textcompwordmark.lyx
Description: application/lyx
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
