Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 16:56:48, schrieb Kornel Benko <[email protected]> > Am Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 04:16:22, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <[email protected]> > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:23:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:34:53PM +0200, jpc wrote: > > > > commit c9f398d7c516f9e9f3df71e74231a87e639180b9 > > > > Author: jpc <[email protected]> > > > > Date: Wed Jul 12 22:31:30 2017 +0200 > > > > > > > > Copy documentation of new features of Additional.lyx in de, es, > > > > fr and ja documentation files > > > > as change tracking and remove chnage tracking in Additional.lyx > > > > > > > > lib/doc/Additional.lyx | 484 ++------------------ > > > > lib/doc/de/Additional.lyx | 994 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > lib/doc/es/Additional.lyx | 995 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > lib/doc/fr/Additional.lyx | 1009 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > lib/doc/ja/Additional.lyx | 1137 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > 5 files changed, 4080 insertions(+), 539 deletions(-) > > > > > > This commit broke the following tests: > > > > > > export/doc/de/Additional_pdf4_systemF > > > export/doc/de/Additional_pdf5_systemF > > > > > > I just wanted to document which commit broke the test, in case anyone > > > wanted to take a look (it's possible it's due to a bug in our language > > > nesting/switching) and so that when others see the failing test they are > > > aware. > > > > Actually the errors I see are about missing glyphs. I don't think there > > is a regression here. > > > > Scott > > Looks like we cannot use \texcompmark macro in xelatex and lualatex. >
Just retested with
TL2015: Previously attached works with xelatex + lualatex
TL2016: works with lualatex but not with xelatex (missing glyphs)
TL2017: does not work for both (missing glyphs)
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
