On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:41:18AM +0000, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 11:13 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > When using Biblatex and exporting to 2.2.x, I think we need to set the
> > bibliography processor to biber, right?
> >
> > I'm guessing this wasn't caught before because a lot of testers have
> > biber set in preferences.
> >
> > Attached is a patch. It works well for me, but I am not very familiar
> > with lyx2lyx.
> 
> No view on whether we should do this. Jürgen will know. But if we do....

+1

> > diff --git a/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_3.py b/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_3.py
> > index edc5b1f..cb3204b 100644
> > --- a/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_3.py
> > +++ b/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_3.py
> > @@ -1222,6 +1222,11 @@ def revert_biblatex(document):
> >              bbxopts += "," + biblio_options
> >          bbxopts += "]"
> >          add_to_preamble(document, "\\usepackage" + bbxopts + "{biblatex}")
> > +        i = find_token(document.header, "\\bibtex_command", 0)
> > +        if i == -1:
> > +            document.warning("Malformed document! Missing 
> > \\bibtex_command")
> 
> In this case, you can still insert the command. You just need to figure
> out where you want to put it.

Ah thanks. I will ask you for more details (or a reference to an
example) if we do decide something like this patch is worth doing.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to