Le 01/02/2018 à 22:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:19:03PM +0000, Guillaume MM wrote:
Le 01/02/2018 à 18:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:00:43PM +0000, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 01.02.2018, 11:40 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Donnerstag, den 01.02.2018, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
This makes much sense. You could probably move the new line to the
GuiWorkArea constructor...
Yes, this seems to work as well.
I have now pushed this fix to master.
Thanks for the fix, Jürgen. Let's double-check with Guillaume and port
to 2.3.x. Guillaume does this patch make sense to you?


Dear Scott, this looks good to me.
Thanks for taking a look.

I would not have proposed it for 2.3,
I'm pretty sure I know what you mean but I want to make 100% sure:

You mean the new compressor in the first place (i.e. commit 789617b8),
right? Conditional on us keeping that commit for 2.3.0, you do agree
that it makes sense to backport the follow-up 5ce36019, right?

Yes, you need Jürgen's fix.

The new compressor is in 2.3.0rc2. If we do not receive any other
reports that seem linked to it, do you agree that we should keep the
compressor for 2.3.0? Or do you have reason to think there is a
significant chance of a nasty bug that we might not encounter while
testing that could be serious?
The source of uncertainty is that it changes the behaviour on all platforms in a non-specific way. Just make sure it is well tested on all platforms. To test it, put the system in heavy load and check that LyX behaves nicely when overwhelmed with keyboard input, not necessarily with autorepeat.




Reply via email to