Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 14/02/2018 ?? 17:11, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> I took a look at the Qt4 and Qt5 code and did not see a difference. It >>> might be that our fonts are malformed. >> I loaded esint10.ttf into fontforge and when I go to Metrics->set >> L/RBearings >> of integral sign (#1) I see the value 113.5. >> I doesn't look as what your log stated or do I read it wrong? > > You read it right, ttfdump says the same in the glyf/hmtx tables. > > My problem if the DejaVuSerif-Italic, where I take my italic f, has similar > values, but Qt return good results. I suspect that there are other values > somewhere in the font that conflict with our metrics.
So what about copy-paste esint(f) into DejaVuSerif-Italic via fontforge and check what happens. If there is some metainfo set wrong we could use Dejavu as a skeleton and copy our symbols there... Pavel
