On Monday, January 11, 2021 9:06:27 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I would prefer to ignore the last 0 be default, since the sub-releases
> are rare.
>
> Thus: 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.2.1
>
> I do not like extra numbers that almost never move.
>
> And it makes parsing of version number more interesting.
>
> JMarc
FWIW, personally, I agree with you.
What I described was the semantic versioning scheme.
In rpm, that I know well due to packaging for Fedora, allows the scheme you
suggest. E.g.
$ rpmdev-vercmp 3.0.10 3.1
3.0.10 < 3.1
--
José Abílio
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
