On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 04:16:36PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 07.05.2021 um 15:30 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > And using the inset is better because the change is reflected in the > > UI. > > Sort of. Currently a glitch is that the change is only reflected as of > the item that follows the inset, whereas it actually applies to the > whole list when the inset is in the list preamble. > > This should be fixable, though.
Good point, I noticed that too. The only alternative I can think of would be for the counter manager to be a bit smarter. For example, suppose we set the Numbered List (Level 1) counter outside of an enum. Can LyX realize that the intent is for the counter to be modified at the beginning of the next list? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
