On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 03:41:35PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > > > The "TeX inset" on the other hand, is clear and intuitive. > > In a DocBook document "TeX" won't make much sense. Whoa. Never thought of that. In my mind, the LyX backend is always LaTeX. > On the other hand "Raw" may make more sense when used in both LaTeX and > DocBook documents. Probably a good description. > You could also just call it a "Markup" inset since > LaTeX and DocBook are markup languages. To me, though, markup seems like it's even more marked up than LyX, not more raw. I'd go with raw. -Amir
- Rename 666 to TEX Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Herbert Voss
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Garst R. Reese
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Juergen Vigna
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Amir Karger
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Allan Rae
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Amir Karger
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Andre Poenitz
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Andre Poenitz
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX John Levon
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Andre Poenitz
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Herbert Voss
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Herbert Voss
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Garst R. Reese
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Herbert Voss
- Re: Rename 666 to TEX Ronny Buchmann