Hey guys,
Poking around in the source tree I found a few cases of vector.size()
being used where vector.empty could've been instead.
Cheers
Koz
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.389
diff -u -r1.389 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 2001/11/08 11:46:05 1.389
+++ ChangeLog 2001/11/09 00:33:47
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2001-11-09 Michael A. Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * Layout.C: replaced a few cases of std::vector.size() == 0 with
+ std::vector.empty().
+
2001-11-07 John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* minibuffer.h:
Index: layout.C
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/layout.C,v
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -r1.42 layout.C
--- layout.C 2001/09/20 10:16:23 1.42
+++ layout.C 2001/11/09 00:33:48
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@
LyXTextClassList::NameOfClass(LyXTextClassList::size_type number) const
{
static string const dummy("dummy");
- if (classlist.size() == 0) {
+ if (classlist.empty()) {
return dummy;
}
lyx::Assert(number < classlist.size());
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@
{
static string const dummy("dummy");
classlist[number].load();
- if (classlist.size() == 0) {
+ if (classlist.empty()) {
return dummy;
}
lyx::Assert(number < classlist.size());
@@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@
LyXTextClassList::DescOfClass(LyXTextClassList::size_type number) const
{
static string const dummy("dummy");
- if (classlist.size() == 0) {
+ if (classlist.empty()) {
return dummy;
}
lyx::Assert(number < classlist.size());
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@
}
lyxerr[Debug::TCLASS] << "End of parsing of textclass.lst" << endl;
- if (classlist.size() == 0) {
+ if (classlist.empty()) {
lyxerr << "LyXTextClassList::Read: no textclasses found!"
<< endl;
WriteAlert(_("LyX wasn't able to find any layout description!"),