On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:28:21PM +0300, Eran Tromer wrote: > > > A naive question of Bugzilla policy -- if this is an acknowledged by all > > as a problematic issue, why mark it WONTFIX as opposed to setting a > > far-away milestone or something? Definitely not 1.2.x stuff, but you do > > want it addressed *sometime* by *someone*, don't you? > > Not so sure about that, it will always add complexity. > > Anyway, RESOLVED LATER is a bad idea and we shouldn't use it.
Agreed. My experience after using Bugzilla intensively for two years is that you should relentlessly use WONTFIX, INVALID when you decide that it's not beneficial to fix it for the next release. If the bugs are real and a PITA, they will be reported again at a later point in time, and then you can reconsider them. Greets, Asger
