On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:49:04PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Agreed. My experience after using Bugzilla intensively for two years
> is that you should relentlessly use WONTFIX, INVALID when you decide
> that it's not beneficial to fix it for the next release.
Nooo, please let's not do this. Bugs will just get dropped on the floor.
Here's my take :
INVALID - not a bug or not a LyX bug, pilot error etc.
WONTFIX - acknowledged bug to some degree, not worth fixing "on its own"
Any bug that doesn't fit these two should *stay open*
It is easy for those who don't care about bugs that won't be
fixed for the next release to save a named query that filters them out.
If we just close these bugs, there's no point in having the "milestone"
field IMHO
> If the bugs are real and a PITA, they will be reported again at a
> later point in time, and then you can reconsider them.
And what about bugs that are real and not a pain in the arse ? they'll
end up staying unfixed - not good
regards
john
--
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel, Dr Johnson once wrote.
Today, for 'patriotism' read 'hiding behind being gay.'"
- The Sun
