On Tuesday 27 August 2002 08:44, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > > And it would be nice to resolve lyx behavious to renaming of files and > buffers on documents that need the lyx2lyx treatment. > > - ask user > - silent operation > - replace file > - new filename
Why should this be different from the actual behaviour? I agree that this is probably the best thing to do here, although I am not sure. My point is: with previous versions if lyx read an old version and you saved it it would update to the new file format, why should it be different now? Don't you trust lyx2lyx code? ;-) Does it makes sense from the user point of view to ask this? Why ask and not warn? Why should it be different now? Notice that you only get the document modified if you save it, and then you still have the old copy around (name.lyx~). > etc... -- Jos� Ab�lio
