On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:34:10AM +0100, Jos� Ab�lio Oliveira Matos wrote: > The usual policy is if you are using cvs then you know what you are doing. > :-) Actually I think that you also have a separate lyx_1.2.x branch, so you > should open and save your document with that version and not with the latest > cvs.
I would reduce the actual _users_ of 1.3 by a factor of two if I did that I suppose... > Take as an example the \end_deeper problem that we had last week, how would > you be able to revert to the old format? It tried to eat just one doc of mine with only a few enumerations. I fixed this manually. > My concern with lyx2lyx is the end user, so I don't care about cvs version. End users have the same problem. 1.2 and 1.1.5 do not works together very well. > Then the read-only flag is the solution. But I repeat, I don't understand > why someone that is using an editing a lyx document with some version doesn't > expect lyx to save with the respective file format... Because I cannot send version 220 .lyx files to people using 1.1.5. Currently we have the Word 2/95/2000 mess. lyx2lyx is fixing this nicely (Thanks again btw), but only in one direction.... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
