On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:02:04PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:30:28PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > [snip rest] > > It's not my fight so I'll just shut up now, except for ... > > > 3) No. My solution (auto-validate with manual negative override) needs > > one button, just like yours (auto-include with manual negative override > > IIUC). The only real difference is that it *does* auto-validate before > > even looking at the button. > > Negatively phrased checkboxes are item no. 356 on the "Ten ways to tell > your UI sucks" list ;)
Sure! Nice to see you have one too ;-) > regards > john Seriously, the three radio button idea isn't bad, even if formally more complex. Much more intuitive. best Martin
msg45150/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
