On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:52:12PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > would be closer to the intention. This way, the check you added to the > > beginning of rowBreakPoint would not be needed as well. > > But the doesn't the height etc have to be set on the row?
Hm yes. setRowHeight should do fine though, and we would not need to call fill... Well, I think it _is_ a special case, so better handle it as such in the place where it occurs and do not shift responsibility to rowBreakPoint. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
