Andre Poenitz wrote: > Well, I think it _is_ a special case, so better handle it as such > in the place where it occurs and do not shift responsibility to > rowBreakPoint.
Ok, I'll do it. Alfredo
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Well, I think it _is_ a special case, so better handle it as such > in the place where it occurs and do not shift responsibility to > rowBreakPoint.
Ok, I'll do it. Alfredo