Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bj�nnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> yeah... RH 7.3 how old is that now? RH 8 has come and gone, RH 9
| Lars> is still going strong, with RH 10 looming on the horizon...
>
| Lars> I am of course a strange creature, but I see no reason to stick
| Lars> with RH 7.3, especially not for C++ developers, or people that
| Lars> expect to compile C++ code.
>
| This is rather a matter of being easily able to provide a binary rpm
| for users. I understand that the new debugstream code is nice, but it
| is probably not a good enough reason to switch.
static compile
| Lars> Also first gcc compiler in the 3 series was released June 18.
| Lars> 2001. that is now almost two years ago...
>
| I suspect that if somebody complained about gcc 3.0.x problem, you
| would say to forget about it...
yes. :-)
gcc 3.1.x is minimum.
--
Lgb
