Christian Ridderstr�m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
>
>> Christian Ridderstr�m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
>> | other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
>> >
>> | If it's important to make LyX compile with 2.9.6 in the future, I can
>> | take another look at this.
>>
>> yeah... RH 7.3 how old is that now? RH 8 has come and gone, RH 9 is
>> still going strong, with RH 10 looming on the horizon...
>>
>> I am of course a strange creature, but I see no reason to stick with
>> RH 7.3, especially not for C++ developers, or people that expect to
>> compile C++ code.
>
| Unless you are ranting,
I am.
| I was mainly thinking about users who would like
| to be able to install lyx 1.4 on RH 7.3...
| (it's strange, but later versions of RH need better hardware...)
Ok, slightly harder on hardware, but not much. (and it is mem not cpu)
Anyway... there is no problem to use a static compiled lyx on RH 7.3.
--
Lgb
